Real Estate Transaction Coordination Integrations with DocupletionForms


A transaction coordinator’s real job is assembling the same packet, deal after deal — the right disclosures, the right addenda, the commission paperwork, the closing checklist — each keyed to a handful of facts about the transaction. That is precisely the work a deterministic, rule-based document engine is built to take over.

DocupletionForms takes one intake of transaction data, applies conditional logic to decide which documents the deal needs — by state, by side, by transaction type — merges the data in, and delivers the finished set to your transaction-management platform for signature and tracking. The same inputs always produce the same packet, with no AI guessing in the path. This guide lays out the options: what feeds the engine, what it produces, and which real estate platforms it can exchange with.

A note on scope. The connections below are suggested integration patterns, not pre-built one-click connectors for every platform named. DocupletionForms ships live bidirectional webhooks, a Salesforce add-on, and Zapier support (including multi-document output). Several platforms named here publish their own Zapier apps or APIs and include built-in forms and e-signature; the value DocupletionForms adds is conditional, multi-document packet selection across the whole deal. Confirm the specifics for any platform — especially how a finished PDF is delivered — before relying on a single path.

The shape of a transaction-coordination workflow

Every pattern here follows the same spine. Transaction data arrives from a CRM, a listing feed, or an intake form. Rules decide which documents the deal needs for that state and side. The data is merged in. The finished files go to the transaction-management platform for signature and compliance review, and status flows back to the CRM and the accounting tool. The deterministic middle is what keeps every deal’s packet consistent.

CRM / listing / intake data
rule-based document selection
merge and populate
deliver to the transaction platform
e-sign, then update CRM and accounting

Where the data comes from

The inputs drive selection, so the more structured the source, the less anyone touches the documents afterward. Useful sources include:

  • The DocupletionForms intake form. The primary driver. State, transaction type (sale, lease, new construction), representation side (listing or buyer), financing type, and property type are exactly what the conditional logic keys on.
  • Real estate CRMs — Follow Up Boss, kvCORE / Inside Real Estate, Lofty, LionDesk, Wise Agent, Realvolve. They carry the contact, property, and deal record. Most already push deals to transaction tools, so the same data can feed document generation.
  • Listing and MLS data (via RESO feeds). Property address, price, and parcel detail can prefill the packet directly from the listing.
  • The transaction platform itself, as a source. A management system (linked below) can push deal and party data into DocupletionForms to pre-fill and select, then receive the finished documents back.
  • Payment and accounting — QuickBooks, Stripe. Commission and fee data for disbursement authorizations and invoices; payment status can gate a release.

The deterministic spine, in field terms: state + transaction type + representation side + financing type + property type decides the exact document set, every time.

What the engine can produce

DocupletionForms merges your data into the document templates your brokerage uses and is licensed for — selecting the correct set for the state and side. Note that association and state forms are licensed through providers such as Lone Wolf (zipForm), and transaction platforms include their own form libraries; the value here is conditional selection and assembly across the whole packet. A single deal can produce:

  • The state- and side-specific disclosure package
  • Addenda selected by transaction type — financing, contingency, repair, lead-based paint, HOA
  • Commission and disbursement authorization forms
  • Closing and compliance checklists keyed to the deal’s stage
  • Client welcome packets and transaction timelines
  • Wire-fraud and consumer advisories
  • Vendor order forms for title, escrow, and inspection
  • Contingency-removal and amendment packages
  • Cover letters, broker files, and audit-ready document sets

Where the finished documents go: transaction platforms

These are the systems coordinators and brokerages run deals on. Each can receive generated documents or exchange deal data, with the usual data-versus-PDF distinction: moving record data is one capability; attaching the actual PDF is another, usually via API or a connected store.

  • Dotloop. A widely used platform with a genuine Zapier app (a new-loop trigger and create-loop action), an open API, webhook support, built-in e-signature, and a QuickBooks commission sync. The strongest integration anchor of the group.
  • SkySlope. Document management and broker compliance review with built-in e-signature and state-specific checklists, plus API access on Enterprise plans for custom integrations.
  • Brokermint. A back-office platform with the broadest integration ecosystem of the group — QuickBooks, Xero, Salesforce, Follow Up Boss, Inside Real Estate, Dropbox, Google Drive, and MLS feeds — making it flexible for an existing tech stack.
  • Paperless Pipeline. Transaction-coordinator-focused, with native DocuSign, Dropbox Sign, and Follow Up Boss integrations, CSV transaction import, built-in eSign, and a status-change trigger that pushes to thousands of apps through Zapier.
  • Open To Close. Built specifically for coordinators, with a read/write API, Zapier support, a deep Follow Up Boss sync, and a conditionals engine that triggers tasks by deal type and stage.
  • Lone Wolf Transactions (zipForm). The dominant forms-and-transactions ecosystem in much of the U.S., and the licensing path for many association forms.

Signature and storage

Many transaction platforms include e-signature, but where you need a standalone signer, DocuSign and Dropbox Sign are the common choices. For the file itself, the reliable cross-platform pattern is to generate the PDF, place it in a connected store — Dropbox, Google Drive, Box — and either link it on the deal record or push it through the platform’s API. Do not assume a one-click “attach PDF” action exists everywhere; it does not.

Connection patterns to choose from

1. Zapier, no code

Because Dotloop and Paperless Pipeline publish real Zapier apps, a new loop or a transaction status change can trigger DocupletionForms to generate the matching packet, and Webhooks by Zapier bridges anything without a native step. The fastest path to a working prototype.

2. Direct webhook or API

DocupletionForms sends submission data and document links straight to a platform’s API — Dotloop’s open API, Open To Close’s read/write API, or SkySlope’s Enterprise API — or to a custom endpoint. The most direct option when a developer is available.

3. CRM-originated

The deal begins in the agent’s CRM; that contact and property data feeds DocupletionForms to generate the packet, and the documents return to the deal — mirroring how teams already pass deals from CRM to transaction platform.

4. Salesforce-native

For brokerages running Salesforce, DocupletionForms’ live Salesforce add-on pushes both the data and the documents onto the record directly — and platforms like Brokermint integrate with Salesforce as well, keeping the back office aligned.

5. Staff-review gate

Insert a human checkpoint: the coordinator confirms the state, side, and key dates, sets the status to approved, and only then does generation fire. Prevents an incomplete or wrong-state packet from reaching a client.

By transaction type

Listing side: property and seller data produces the listing agreement packet, seller disclosures, and the marketing-to-close checklist.

Buyer side: offer and financing data produces the purchase packet, buyer advisories, contingency forms, and the buyer timeline.

Dual / in-house: both-sides data produces the disclosed-dual-agency forms alongside the standard packet.

Lease: tenancy data produces the lease packet, addenda, and move-in documents.

New construction: builder and lot data produces the builder-contract addenda and milestone checklist.

Commercial: entity and property data produces the LOI package, due-diligence checklist, and closing set.

A sensible first build

Strongest first MVP: Dotloop in, the disclosure packet out. Use the Dotloop Zapier trigger so a new loop generates the correct state- and side-specific disclosure set plus its cover letter and checklist, then route the documents back into the loop for signature. It exercises the full loop — data, selection, merge, delivery — on a platform coordinators already use, and the determinism is immediately visible: the same deal always yields the same packet.

The connective tissue, briefly

Three pieces do the plumbing. Webhooks push and receive events the moment a deal or status changes. Zapier links thousands of apps with no code and bridges anything lacking a native step. And the platform’s own API or e-signature pipeline is how the finished packet reaches the deal and the client. DocupletionForms sits in the middle as the deterministic engine that turns transaction data into the correct, complete document set.

If the packet-assembly burden is eating your coordinators’ days, this is a pattern worth prototyping. Start with DocupletionForms as the document layer and connect your CRM and transaction tools around it.

Process Serving & Court E-Filing Integrations with DocupletionForms


A process-serving job is a document pipeline: an order comes in, a server works it, and a proof goes back out — often to be filed with the court. The paperwork is repetitive, jurisdiction-specific, and unforgiving of errors. That is exactly where a deterministic, rule-based document engine pays off.

DocupletionForms takes one intake of order data, applies conditional logic to decide which documents the job needs — the right proof of service for that court, the right field packet, the right invoice — merges the data in, and hands the finished set to your management platform or to an e-filing provider. The same order always produces the same documents, with no AI guessing in the path. This guide lays out the options: what feeds the engine, what it produces, and which process-serving and court-filing platforms it can exchange with.

A note on scope. The connections below are suggested integration patterns, not pre-built one-click connectors for every platform named. DocupletionForms ships live bidirectional webhooks, a Salesforce add-on, and Zapier support (including multi-document output). Several platforms named here — ServeManager most notably — expose their own Zapier apps or APIs; e-filing providers vary widely in how (and whether) they accept programmatic input. Confirm the specifics for any given platform, especially how a finished PDF is delivered, before relying on a single path.

The shape of a process-serving document workflow

Every pattern here follows the same spine. Order data arrives from a law firm, a case-management system, or an intake form. Rules decide which documents the job needs for that court and service type. The data is merged in. The finished files go to your process-serving platform, back to the law firm, and — where the proof must be filed — to a court e-filing service provider. The deterministic middle is what makes it repeatable across jurisdictions.

Order / case data
rule-based document selection
merge and populate
deliver to the serving platform
file the proof via an e-filing provider

Where the data comes from

The inputs drive selection, so the more structured the source, the less anyone touches the documents afterward. Useful sources include:

  • The DocupletionForms order/intake form. The primary driver. Court and jurisdiction, document type (summons, subpoena, citation, notice), service type (personal, substitute, posting), recipient type, and number of defendants are exactly what the conditional logic keys on.
  • Law-firm case management — Clio, MyCase, Filevine, Smokeball, PracticePanther. Where the case, parties, and documents originate. Many already pass orders to serving and filing tools, so the same case data can feed document generation.
  • The serving platform itself, as a source. A management system (linked below) can push job, party, and court-case data into DocupletionForms to pre-fill and select, then receive the finished documents back.
  • Payment and accounting — QuickBooks, Stripe. Billing status can gate whether an invoice or release document generates.
  • Bulk lists — Google Sheets or CSV. High-volume operations can feed batches of jobs through a spreadsheet to generate packets in bulk.

The deterministic spine, in field terms: court and jurisdiction + document type + service method + recipient and party count decides the exact document set, every time.

What the engine can produce

DocupletionForms merges your order data into the document templates your operation uses — selecting the correct version for the court and service type. Note that platforms like ServeManager already include their own affidavit libraries; the value here is conditional, multi-document selection across the whole job and across jurisdictions. A single order can produce:

  • The correct proof or affidavit of service for the court, including non-service affidavits
  • Field sheets and service instructions for the server
  • Declarations of diligence and due-diligence logs
  • Jurisdiction-specific proof-of-service forms selected by court
  • Skip-trace and address-verification request forms
  • Notarization-ready affidavit packages
  • Multi-defendant batches generated from one order
  • Invoices, client cover letters, and status summaries
  • E-filing cover sheets and document packages prepared for submission

Where the finished documents go: serving platforms

These are the management systems process servers and attorney services run their operations on. Each can receive generated documents or exchange job data, with the same data-versus-PDF distinction that applies everywhere: moving record data is one capability; attaching the actual PDF is another, usually via API or a connected store.

  • ServeManager. The most widely used cloud platform, with a genuine Zapier app (triggers for new jobs, logged attempts, and issued invoices; actions to create jobs and court cases), a public API, a built-in affidavit/template library, and SOC 2 compliance. The strongest integration anchor of the group.
  • Process Server’s Toolbox (PST). A long-established management system for process servers and attorney services, by DBS.
  • Tristar WinServe. A full attorney-service suite (dispatch, proofs, invoicing, mobile GPS capture) that can be hosted in-house or in the cloud.
  • LegalConnect. End-to-end legal-support software for attorney services that also provides eFiling and eService — meaning it spans both buckets in this guide.
  • PaperTracker. Job and document tracking built for process-serving operations.
  • ValetServe. Another management option for process servers and legal-support firms.

Where the finished documents go: court e-filing providers

When the proof of service must be filed with the court, it goes through an electronic filing service provider (EFSP) — the intermediary between you and the court’s back-end system (for example, the Tyler Odyssey systems behind eFileTexas, eFileCA, eFileIL, and others). Several EFSPs offer a REST API or bulk filing for integration; many are portal-based. DocupletionForms’ role is to produce the court-ready document; filing it is the EFSP’s step, often initiated by the firm. Certified and widely used providers include:

  • InfoTrack. Document-driven eFiling plus process serving, with deep integrations into case-management systems like Clio, MyCase, and LEAP — and an established ordering link with ServeManager.
  • One Legal. Court-approved eFiling across California and Nevada, plus process serving and document delivery (an InfoTrack company).
  • Rapid Legal. eFiling and litigation support with a secure online portal, certified across multiple court systems.
  • Green Filing. A cost-focused EFSP with auto-fill filing, electronic service, and process-serving add-ons.
  • File & ServeXpress. A long-standing full-service eFiling and eService platform built for complex, high-volume litigation.
  • 1eFile. Court eFiling and process service with published eFiling APIs for automation and bulk filing.
  • US Legal Pro, FileTime, iDocket, and TurboCourt. Additional certified providers covering Texas and other Odyssey-based court systems, each with its own feature and pricing model.

For the file itself, the reliable cross-platform pattern is to generate the PDF, place it in a connected store — Dropbox, Google Drive, Box — and either link it on the job record or push it through the platform’s API. Do not assume a one-click “attach PDF” action exists everywhere; it does not.

Connection patterns to choose from

1. Zapier, no code

Because ServeManager publishes a real Zapier app, a new job or logged attempt can trigger DocupletionForms to generate the matching documents, and Webhooks by Zapier can bridge anything without a native step. The fastest path to a working prototype.

2. Direct webhook or API

DocupletionForms sends submission data and document links straight to a platform’s API or a custom endpoint. The most direct option when a developer is available and the platform exposes an API.

3. Case-management originated

The job begins in the firm’s case-management system; that case data feeds DocupletionForms to generate the packet, and the proof returns to the matter — mirroring how firms already order service and filing from those systems.

4. Generate, then hand off to an EFSP

DocupletionForms produces the court-ready proof; it is then filed through the appropriate e-filing provider for that jurisdiction. Keeps document generation and court submission cleanly separated.

5. Staff-review gate

Insert a human checkpoint: a clerk confirms the serve details and court, sets the status to approved, and only then does generation fire. Prevents an incorrect affidavit from ever reaching a court.

A sensible first build

Strongest first MVP: ServeManager in, the proof packet out. Use the ServeManager Zapier trigger so a completed serve generates the correct affidavit of service plus its cover letter and invoice, then route the documents back to the job record or to your e-filing provider. It exercises the full loop — data, selection, merge, delivery — on the platform most process servers already run, and the determinism is immediately visible: the same serve always yields the same court-ready packet.

The connective tissue, briefly

Three pieces do the plumbing. Webhooks push and receive events the moment a job or attempt changes. Zapier links thousands of apps with no code and bridges anything lacking a native step. And the platform’s own API or e-filing pipeline is how the finished proof reaches the job record or the court. DocupletionForms sits in the middle as the deterministic engine that turns order data into the correct, complete document set.

If the affidavit-and-packet burden is slowing your operation down, this is a pattern worth prototyping. Start with DocupletionForms as the document layer and connect your serving and filing tools around it.

DocupletionForms Zapier Integration V1.4 Update COMPLETE!

 

DocupletionForms Zapier Integration – Version 1.4

Officially Promoted on Zapier

Version 1.4 is now live and publicly approved by Zapier.
After full draft testing, the integration has been successfully promoted and is production-ready.

What Version 1.4 Enables

With DocupletionForms v1.4, you can:

  • Send data from any Zapier-supported application
  • Map that data to a DocupletionForms form
  • Automatically merge the data into one or multiple PDF documents
  • Deliver the generated PDF via email or downstream Zapier automation
Automation Flow:
Any App → Zapier → DocupletionForms → Data-Merged PDF → Anywhere

How the Workflow Works

Example: Google Sheets → Automated PDF

  1. A new row is added in Google Sheets
  2. Zapier triggers
  3. Zap sends the sheet data to DocupletionForms
  4. Form fields are mapped to incoming data
  5. Internal Data-Merge maps form fields to PDF fields
  6. PDF is generated automatically
  7. The PDF is emailed or sent through additional Zap steps

The original data can also continue downstream in Zapier.

Core Value Proposition

Middleware Integration-as-a-Service

Instead of building custom PDF engines or backend automation pipelines, you simply:

  • Map fields
  • Configure merge settings
  • Connect through Zapier
  • Automate document output

No custom code required.

Why This Is Powerful

Most automation tools move data. Few can:

  • Convert structured data into properly formatted PDFs
  • Support internal conditional logic
  • Handle multi-document merges
  • Distribute documents through multiple delivery paths

Version 1.4 delivers stable, production-ready PDF automation inside Zapier.

Ideal Use Cases

  • Legal document automation
  • Contract generation workflows
  • Government or nonprofit form processing
  • SaaS platforms needing PDF generation
  • HR onboarding packets
  • Insurance documentation
  • Real estate contracts
  • Compliance or structured documentation pipelines

What’s New in v1.4

  • Officially promoted to Public by Zapier
  • Improved stability after draft testing
  • Enhanced data handling in Zap-based submissions
  • Reliable downstream Zap continuation
  • Production-ready PDF merge workflows

Architecture Overview

External App

Zapier Trigger

DocupletionForms Form Submission

Internal Field Mapping

PDF Data-Merge Engine

Email or Zapier Output

Reliability & Approval

Version 1.4 has been:

  • Fully tested in draft mode
  • Approved and promoted by Zapier
  • Verified for public production use

Get Started

  1. Create a Zap
  2. Select your trigger app
  3. Choose DocupletionForms
  4. Map your fields
  5. Configure your PDF merge
  6. Test and activate

You now have fully automated document generation.

 

How to Turn a Fillable PDF into a Question-Based Intake Form

How to Use a PDF Intake Encoding SOP to Turn Any Fillable PDF into a Question-Based Workflow

Fillable PDFs are everywhere in professional work. Law firms, accountants, consultants,
schools, nonprofits, and businesses all rely on them to collect information from clients,
staff, or the public. Yet despite being “fillable,” most PDFs are still difficult to use
efficiently.

People type into the wrong boxes. Important fields are missed. The same information is
entered multiple times. And when PDFs are handed off to others, there is rarely a clear,
repeatable process for turning those documents into structured, question-based forms.

This is exactly the problem the PDF Intake Question Encoding SOP is designed
to solve.

This article explains what the SOP is, what it allows you to do, and how people can use it
to reliably create questions that correctly fill out the fields of any uploaded fillable PDF.


What Is the PDF Intake Question Encoding SOP?

The PDF Intake Question Encoding SOP is a short, printable instruction document. Its sole
purpose is to explain how to create questions that correctly populate a fillable PDF.

It is not software. It is not a technical manual. It does not require programming knowledge.
Instead, it acts as a clear set of rules and steps that can be followed by:

  • Staff members
  • Encoders or form builders
  • Consultants
  • Clients
  • Or even AI assistants

When the SOP is uploaded into an AI Chat like ChatGPT alongside a fillable PDF, it provides all the guidance needed to
determine:

  • What questions should be asked
  • What each question should say
  • What type of answer each question should collect
  • Which PDF field each answer should fill

In other words, it turns a static document into a structured intake process.


The Core Problem with Fillable PDFs

Although fillable PDFs look simple on the surface, they hide several challenges:

  • Field labels are often unclear or inconsistent
  • Some fields look similar but serve different purposes
  • Users don’t know what information belongs in which box
  • Different people interpret the same PDF differently

This leads to errors, back-and-forth communication, and wasted time.

The SOP solves this by shifting the focus away from “filling boxes” and toward
asking the right questions.


The Key Principle: Questions Collect Meaning

The SOP is built around one simple idea:

Questions collect meaning. PDF fields receive meaning. Mapping connects the two.

A question is written to capture a specific piece of information. A PDF field is simply a
destination where that information should appear. The SOP teaches users how to connect those
two things correctly and consistently.


How the SOP Is Used in Practice

Using the SOP follows a straightforward process.

Step 1: Upload the Fillable PDF

Start by uploading the fillable PDF you want to work with. This could be a client intake form,
an application, a disclosure, or any other document with fillable fields.

Step 2: Review the PDF Visually

Open the PDF and read it carefully:

  • Go from top to bottom
  • Move left to right
  • Identify every box that expects information

This step ensures that no field is overlooked.

Step 3: Identify the PDF Field Names

Every fillable box in a PDF has a field name. These names are what determine where answers
will appear in the document.

The SOP instructs users to rely on the field names exactly as they are shown when mapping
answers to the PDF.

Examples of field names include:

  • LAST NAME
  • DATE OF BIRTH
  • CURRENT RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS

These names are treated as authoritative.


Writing Questions That Match the PDF

Once the PDF fields are identified, the next step is to write questions that match them
by meaning.

The SOP makes an important distinction:

  • The wording of the question does not need to match the field name
  • The meaning of the question must match exactly

For example:

PDF Field Name: DATE OF BIRTH

Question: What is the client’s date of birth?

Different wording, same meaning.


Choosing the Right Question Type

The SOP also explains how to choose the appropriate type of question based on the kind of
information being collected.

  • Short text for names and identifiers
  • Paragraph text for explanations or descriptions
  • Phone fields for phone numbers
  • Email fields for email addresses

This improves usability while keeping the PDF output correct.


Adding Help Text to Reduce Errors

Help text is optional, but strongly recommended.

The SOP encourages adding brief instructions beneath each question to explain:

  • Formatting expectations
  • What information is required
  • What to include or exclude

This reduces mistakes and follow-up questions.


Verifying That the PDF Fills Correctly

The final step is verification.

  1. Enter sample answers
  2. Generate the completed PDF
  3. Confirm each answer appears in the correct box

If something appears in the wrong place, the mapping is adjusted until it is correct.


Why This SOP Is So Powerful

The PDF Intake Question Encoding SOP creates consistency.

Instead of each person inventing their own way of “figuring out” a PDF, everyone follows
the same clear process. This makes it possible to:

  • Train staff quickly
  • Delegate encoding work confidently
  • Reuse the process across many PDFs
  • Reduce errors and rework

Most importantly, it transforms PDFs from static documents into reliable, structured workflows.


Who This Is For

This SOP is useful for anyone who regularly works with fillable PDFs, including:

  • Professional service firms
  • Administrative teams
  • Consultants and implementers
  • Organizations onboarding new clients
  • Anyone responsible for document intake

Final Takeaway

Fillable PDFs don’t have to be confusing or inconsistent.

With the PDF Intake Question Encoding SOP, you can clearly explain how to turn any PDF into
a set of well-written questions that reliably fill the correct fields every time.

Upload the SOP. Upload the PDF. Follow the steps. The rest takes care of itself.

Checking PDF Checkboxes via Multiple Conditions!

THIS IS HUGE!  Checkboxes have been historically difficult!  Our new release inside of DocupletionForms.com is the ability to check multiple checkboxes at one time with one condition and/or any multiple set of conditions or group of conditions paired with other group conditions.  You can also set the minimum and/or maximum number of checkboxes that will be checked inside of the PDF from the FormBuilder itself.  This is a simple release note and we are going to be working on more instructions and examples.  The way it did function inside of DocupletionForms.com was that you could only use the checkbox utility in the form and it would only check one checkbox at a time.  Now you can trigger a checkbox to be checked in a PDF by any combination of conditions that a form submission presents.  It is possible from time to time that the PDF you are attmepting to automate will not allow inputs from outside programs via embedded programming in their meta data.  This is an issue no matter what and you have to become a PDF expert and flatten the PDF and then make your own fill-in-the-blanks, which is outside the scope of our program.  We work on California Judicial Council Forms and they tend to be the most difficult types of documents in general across all industries, but as such, any other PDF Document tends to be much easier to automate!

conditional logic url forward matrix form

I set the conditional logic in this matrix form https://apexlawservice.com/hire (just use the “matrix field” element in the builder) to forward on submit to https://apexlawservice.com unless the first two answers were “yes” and the third answer was “not yes”, in which case the form forwards to https://apexlawservice.com/more.  This was done to take a person not already
working with an Attorney directly to the page where they can leave a message for an Attorney, or to take a person  already working with an Attorney to a main information page so they can read information if they so choose.
This page is a folder named “hire” in the ApexLawService.com cPanel File Manager and I created a simple “index.html” file in the folder and in the file is simply the html code that DocupletionForms.com makes when you click the html option on the publish/share tab. You can use our contact form for FREE.

Conditional Webhooks!

CONDITIONAL WEBHOOKS!

When somebody enters their information into your form, you can send CONDITIONAL WEBHOOKS to Zapier or anywhere else on the internet based on the conditions that you set.  Depending on how the people who submit your form answer your questions, different triggering webhooks will be sent to Zapier and Zapier will then trigger an action in any of the 2000+ programs as you determine in the Zap inside of your Zapier account.

  • You can ask people if they would like to also be added to your weekly email list when they leave you a contact form and if they click “yes” you can then send a CONDITIONAL WEBHOOK to Zapier to trigger the inclusion of a name and email in the email series program that you use.
  • You can send a CONDITIONAL WEBHOOK to FormStack Documents (formerly WebMerge) that will use the data entered into the form to automatically fill out a document.
  • You can add a contact in Clio.
  • You can add a Loop in DotLoop.
  • The list goes on.  There is no limit to the number of CONDITIONAL WEBHOOKS that you can send.

Disable a Hidden Field that is Required When Shown!

1. If you have a checkbox that you want checked so that people filling out your form, you have to uncheck to deselect it rather than check it to select it, type the following:   

                                                         |check   

Right after the selection in the checkbox just like the illustration below.

2. Then in the field that you want shown if somebody leaves the checkbox checked, click required so that we can then go to the conditional logic to show you how to properly conditionally disable and enable the required field.

3. Check to disable the field in the add action when the checkbox is not checked.  then make sure to make a second rule (at the very bottom) that hides the field is the checkbox is not checked.  This way you do not set the field to be required and when it is hidden have a form that cannot be submitted because there is a hidden yet still required field.  fun, fun, fun.  

Link to the form so you can see the disabled element be required and enabled when selected and shown.

https://docupletionforms.com/formbuilder/forms/example-conditional-logic-form

How to set conditional logic rules in a form.

1. Made a simple contact form with 3 fields we do not need to show unless the answer to the previous question indicates that the person filling out the form has one or more of the following: phone number, website or Facebook.

2. So then we save the form and click the 3rd option at the bottom so that you can use the Form Manager to set the conditional logic rules.  

3. In the Form Manager click actions and conditional rules.

4.  Then click add rule, condition and action 3 times or however many times you need to set as many rules as you want.  These are simple rules for showing a text field question if the person has indicated in the check box that they have any of the following: phone, website, Facebook. Simple. 

The link to this form is: https://docupletionforms.com/formbuilder/forms/example-conditional-logic-form

Hope this helps.  – James